h23854 s 00003/00003/00128 d D 1.9 23/11/01 15:24:02 bevans 9 8 c Up e s 00002/00001/00129 d D 1.8 21/12/03 19:17:21 bevans 8 7 c Updated e s 00039/00002/00091 d D 1.7 21/12/03 19:14:58 bevans 7 6 c Updated e s 00026/00001/00067 d D 1.6 21/12/01 09:20:05 bevans 6 5 c Updated e s 00009/00000/00059 d D 1.5 21/11/28 15:54:52 bevans 5 4 c Updated e s 00001/00001/00058 d D 1.4 21/11/28 11:28:51 bevans 4 3 c Updated e s 00006/00065/00053 d D 1.3 21/11/28 11:27:29 bevans 3 2 c Updated e s 00002/00024/00116 d D 1.2 21/11/28 11:25:05 bevans 2 1 c Updated e s 00140/00000/00000 d D 1.1 21/11/28 10:42:56 bevans 1 0 c date and time created 21/11/28 10:42:56 by bevans e u U f i f e 0 t T I 1
Videos:
Brian Douglas (13:03) -
Darryl Morrell, Part 1 (9:02) -
Darryl Morrell, Part 2 (11:07)
D 2
E 2 D 3
1
F { x(t) h(t) } = ---- X(w) * H(w)
2 pi
That is, multiplication in the time domain is convolution in the frequency domain.
The scaling factor of 1/(2 pi) is due to the fact that w = 2 pi f.
D 2
See the handout on
E 2
I 2
The derivation of the multiplication-in-time property is available in
E 2
Handout T Multiplication-in-Time Fourier Transform Property
Another property that you might need for this problem is that
/ oo
|
x(t) * d(t) = | x(v) d(t - v) dv = x(t)
|
/ -oo
where d(t) is the Dirac delta.
This is due to the sifting property of the Dirac delta (see lecture slides 12-7 through 12-9).
Likewise,
/ oo
|
x(t) * d(t - t0) = | x(v) d(t - t0 - v) dv = x(t - t0)
|
/ -oo
C(w) = F(w) + G(w)To sketch the magnitude response by hand, you can use the following inequality:
| C(w) | = | F(w) + G(w) | ≤ | F(w) | + | G(w) |The inequality decouples the plotting of | F(w) | and | G(w) |.
For the hand sketch, you could draw the spectrum without using a specific numeric value for fc in mind, although fc would have to be larger than the bandwidth of the lowpass signal prior to modulation to get a bandpass spectrum.
E 2 For the MATLAB plot of the magnitude response, you could modify the code from Lecture Slide 14-5 to match the range of frequencies in this problem:
fmaxplot = 20;
wmaxplot = 2*pi*fmaxplot;
w = -wmaxplot : 0.01 : wmaxplot;
H = 2 ./ (2 + j*w);
Hmag = abs(H);
Hphase = phase(H);
figure;
plot(w, Hmag);
title('Magnitude Response');
figure;
plot(w, Hphase);
title('Phase Response');
D 2 You'll need to put in your formulas for H. E 2 I 2 You'll need to put in your formula for H. E 2
D 6
Approach #1. We are treating the signal as the impulse response of an LTI system.
In order to have a frequency response that is bounded in magnitude over all frequenices, the LTI system must be bounded-input bounded-output (BIBO) stable.
In continuous time, a BIBO stable LTI system must have its transfer function in the Laplace domain have a region of convergence that includes the imaginary axis s = j w. For a causal system, this means that the poles must be in the left-half of the Laplace plane. D 7 (The equivalent condition for a causal discrete-time LTI system is that all poles must be include E 7 I 7 (The equivalent condition for a causal discrete-time LTI system is that all poles must be included E 7 the unit circle.)
D 7 For this second part, two of the three impulse responses represent BIBO unstable systems E 7 I 7 For this second part, the impulse responses in parts (a) and (c) represent BIBO unstable systems E 7 because the region of convergence does not include the imaginay (j w) axis, and hence the frequency selectivity cannot be determined. And that would sufficient for an answer in those two cases.
Approach #2. On the other hand, we could analyze the frequency content of the signal. E 6 To determine the frequency content in each signal, one can either
The Fourier transform of the unit step u(t) is
pi delta(w) + 1 / (j w)That transform pair is the second entry in the visual dictionary of Fourier transform pairs. I 7
For part (a), we can compute the Fourier transform of cos(w0 t) u(t) using the Fourier transform property that multiplication in the time domain is convolution in the frequency domain:
X(j w) = (1/(2 pi)) F{ cos(w0 t) } * F{ u(t) }
X(j w) = (1/(2 pi)) (pi delta(w + w0) + pi delta(w - w0)) * ( pi delta(w) + 1 / (j w) )
Recall that
delta(w) * G(w) = G(w)
delta(w - w0) * G(w) = G(w - w0)
X(j w) = (1/2) ( pi delta(w + w0) + pi delta(w - w0) ) + 1 / ( j (w + w0) ) + 1 / ( j (w - w0) )
A plot of |X(j w)| is below:
Note that |X(j w)| is unbounded at w = w0 due to the 1 / ( j (w - w0) ) term and unbounded at w = -w0 due to the 1 / ( j (w + w0) ) term. The frequency content has a bandpass shape.
D 8 A notch filter eliminates a specific frequency w0: E 8 I 8 A notch filter eliminates a specific frequency w0. Recall that a cosine of frequency w0 also has a frequency component at -w0: E 8
cos( w0 t ) = (1/2) e-j w0 t + (1/2) ej w0 t
The notch filter would remove frequencies at w0 and -w0.
Here's an example notch filter magnitude response:
Here's an example pole-zero configuration in the Laplace domain for the above filter:
D 9
E 9
I 9
E 9
E 7
E 6
E 5
E 3

bevans@ece.utexas.edu
E 1