SESSION 6:
Description and Evaluation of the SPICE Phase One Trials Assessments
Khaled El Emam - Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering (Germany)
Dennis R. Goldenson - SEI, Carnegie Mellon University (USA)
Practical tips on SPICE: structure and guide for use
Jean-Martin Simon: CISI (France)
Practical experince with the establishment of improvement plans using the BOOTSTRAP process model
Pasi Kuvaja: Leansoft (Finland)
Richard Messnarz: ISCN (Ireland)
Endeavors: a process system integration infrastructure
Gregory Bolcer, Richard Taylor: University of California (USA)
A Metalinguistic Approach to Process Enactment Extensibility
Gail Kaiser (Columbia University, USA); Israel Ben-Shaul (Technion, Israel);
Stephen Popovich, Stephen Dossick (Columbia University, USA)
A unified framework for software process enactment and improvement
Dennis Avrilionis, Nourredine Belkhatir, Pierre-Yves Cunin: University Joseph Fourier (France)
One of the major obstacles for SPI is the reluctance of business managment to invest in it. There is a general lack of reliable information on the business benefits of SPI, and an absence of hard evidence of satisfactory return on investment. The panel aims to encourage debate on the need for collecting quantitative evidence, and will seek feedback from the audience on whether their organisations measure the costs and benefits, or the return on investment, for SPI.
Panellists to be announced
Links between SPICE and Capability Maturity Models
Susanne Garcia: SEI, Carnegie Mellon University (USA)
Utilising the ami method to target improvements following a SPICE assessment
Annie Combelles: Objectif Technologie (France)
Getting added value from your ISO9001 certification
Alec Dorling: IVF (Sweden)
| ISPA Homepage - This information last updated October 1997 |
| Copyright © 1996-7. All rights reserved. |